← Search

Kyra Travis

— year-end
122 matches · 89W–33L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kyra Travis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
W
2026-07-20 · MCAC:MissHits:Craig:Palmer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-13 · MCAC:MissHits:Craig:Palmer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-29 · MCAC:MissHits:Craig:Palmer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Palmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-5
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Samuel Cohen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
Michelle Liang / Nicholas Ringle
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Camden Mazzoni championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Camden Mazzoni championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · MCAC:Waldron:Majewski · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-15 · MCAC:MissHits:Craig:Palmer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-5
W
2026-06-11 · MCAC:Waldron:Majewski · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-01 · MCAC:MissHits:Craig:Palmer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · with Gregory Cole championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · with Fernando Dias championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams25 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
83.3%
35W–7L · 61.1% of games
7.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 59.9% of games
8.0mixed
77.4%
24W–7L · 60.8% of games
9.0mixed
51.9%
14W–13L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
19 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova