← Search

Ronald Ho

— year-end
64 matches · 36W–28L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Ronald Ho to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
W
2025-06-16 · Deer Park, Ramo/Dikman · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Monahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-04-26 · Deer Park, Ramo/Dikman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Broc Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-06 · Deer Park, Ramo/Dikman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Monahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-03-23 · Deer Park, Ramo/Dikman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Broc Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Benjamin Craddock / Tanya Kotov
2024-12-15 · Deer Park, Baker · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lindsay McMahon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-11-10 · Deer Park, Stevenson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Traci Stevenson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2024-07-24 · Deer Park, Calandra · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2024-07-23 · Deer Park, Calandra · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Hicks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2024-07-16 · Deer Park, Calandra · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kostiantyn Petrovskyi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
N/A
2024-07-02 · Deer Park, Calandra · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Todd Shapiro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-06-13 · Deer Park, Calandra · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anthony LaRocca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2024-06-06 · Deer Park, Calandra · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Calandra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
Teams17 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
47.1%
8W–9L · 47.1% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
75%
3W–1L · 58.7% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 57.3% of games
8.0mixed
70.4%
19W–8L · 58% of games
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
18 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert