← Search

Dana Holloman

Matthews, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
91 matches · 56W–35L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Dana Holloman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history91 matches
L
2026-09-04 · LAndersen (Chestnut Square) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Teresa Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-28 · LAndersen (Chestnut Square) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allison Moseley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-21 · LAndersen (Chestnut Square) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Suzanne Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-14 · LAndersen (Chestnut Square) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Loretta Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · MJones (Life Time) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · MJones (Life Time) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-22 · MJones (Life Time) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-08 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-06 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-27 · MJones (Life Time) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-24 · LAndersen (Chestnut Square Park) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-20 · MJones (Life Time) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
76.7%
23W–7L · 64.1% of games
4.0
42.9%
9W–12L · 44.9% of games
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
12W–0L · 59.4% of games
7.5
50%
9W–9L · 50.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 46% of the time
#1 Singles
46%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
12 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova