← Search

Diana Blocker

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 72W–50L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Diana Blocker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
W
2026-09-14 · TRicks (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amber Troxell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-04 · AMilas (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nicki Spang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · TRicks (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Teller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · TRicks (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amber Troxell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-08-14 · LFerguson/RLee (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jenny Wilken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-13 · MBates (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jenny Wilken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-15 · MBates (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Patricia Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-08 · MBates (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Naomi O'Brien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-27 · EMcGregor/LPond (Jeff Adams) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-04-10 · JWaleski (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-03 · JWaleski (OPRC) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-03-30 · EMcGregor/LPond (Jeff Adams) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicki Spang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
78.3%
18W–5L · 62.2% of games
3.5
36.5%
19W–33L · 47.3% of games
5.5
100%
8W–0L · 73.8% of games
6.5
78.9%
15W–4L · 60.9% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
26 matches
#1 Female Doubles
9%
11 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer