← Search

Bengt Liljas

Rockville, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
231 matches · 129W–102L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Bengt Liljas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history231 matches
L
2026-07-12 · Forster - Double Shots · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Doug DeLawter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Brent Kendall championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-28 · Leuba - Hot Sets · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Duncan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-22 · Kendall · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Siobhan Abell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-06-13 · Forster - Double Shots · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bryan Kay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-06-11 · Hsiung · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Duy Nguyen-Khoa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · Rogers · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sidney Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-5
L
2026-05-27 · Kendall · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kimberlee Overdeck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-23 · Leuba - Hot Sets · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ele Pratt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-13 · Rogers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bryan Kay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-3
W
2026-05-11 · Hsiung · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-27 · Leuba - Hot Sets · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ele Pratt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
66.7%
54W–27L · 57.4% of games
4.5
10%
1W–9L · 36.4% of games
7.5
66.7%
16W–8L · 57.9% of games
8.0
75%
12W–4L · 58.1% of games
8.5
48.8%
21W–22L · 53% of games
8.0mixed
45%
9W–11L · 49.5% of games
8.5mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 35.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
51 matches
#1 Singles
17%
38 matches
#2 Singles
5%
12 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe