← Search

Kathleen McFarlane

— year-end
177 matches · 104W–73L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kathleen McFarlane to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history177 matches
L
2026-07-15 · McManus - McChang · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Marie Randolph
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-4
W
2026-06-15 · McManus - McChang · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Kane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-10 · McManus - McKane · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Treacy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-03 · McManus - McKane · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Marr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · Team 4 Love Bites · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-27 · McManus - McKane · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Treacy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-20 · Hopkins-Sultan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dante Paragas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-13 · McManus - McKane · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Sultan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · Hopkins-Sultan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jamie Holloman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-07 · McManus - McKane · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Sultan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-5
L
2026-04-22 · McManus - McKane · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Marie Randolph
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-20 · Team 4 Love Bites · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Treacy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Teams81 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
64.3%
72W–40L · 56.7% of games
4.0
26.1%
6W–17L · 41.5% of games
6.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 54.4% of games
7.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 57.7% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
87 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
42 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova