← Search

Nataliya Rubanenko

— year-end
117 matches · 62W–55L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Nataliya Rubanenko to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
W
2026-09-09 · JRuggiero/LMonty (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Strump
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-09-07 · JRuggiero (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meaghan Ahern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · JRuggiero (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lori Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-24 · JRuggiero (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meaghan Ahern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-19 · JRuggiero/LMonty (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Saeger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Lisa Strump championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Jennifer Ruggiero championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-12 · JRuggiero/LMonty (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Strump
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-10 · JRuggiero (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meaghan Ahern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-03 · JRuggiero (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Strump
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-21 · LMonty/JRuggiero (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Gluff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · JCarnahan (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anil Verma mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 61.5% of games
3.0
75%
9W–3L · 59.4% of games
3.5
51.4%
19W–18L · 49.6% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
17W–17L · 52.8% of games
7.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 50.3% of games
3.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.8% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
20 matches
#1 Singles
9%
10 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer