← Search

Anne Schmitt

Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 28W–29L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Anne Schmitt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
W
2026-08-27 · LQuattlebaum/Mullins (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amber Nee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · EGold (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathy Hammack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · LQuattlebaum/Mullins (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wesley Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-17 · EGold (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathy Hammack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · LQuattlebaum/Mullins (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chris Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
Jan Wade / Karen Davies
2026-08-10 · EGold (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Edie Butler Rowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-07 · AMilas (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Deana Deep
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-05 · LQuattlebaum/Mullins (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Naomi O'Brien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-03 · EGold (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathy Hammack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-29 · KDay (OPRC) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-2
W
2026-07-27 · MBates (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anita Matai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-15 · KDay (OPRC) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 67.6% of games
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.2% of games
3.5
35.7%
10W–18L · 44% of games
6.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 56% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 23% of the time
#1 Doubles
23%
13 matches
#1 Singles
23%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
9 matches
#2 Singles
12%
7 matches
#3 Singles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer