← Search

Alex Pedersen

Westminster, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
158 matches · 112W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alex Pedersen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history158 matches
W
2026-08-20 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tristan Burm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-08-16 · RCC RED · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hillary Riley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-08-14 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alex Le
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-06 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alex Le
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Andrew Schifle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · RCC RED · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hillary Riley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
Glenn Johnson / Heather Green
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · with Emily Pedersen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Emily Pedersen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-12 · RCC RED · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hillary Riley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-06-28 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Emily Pedersen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-21 · RCC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Emily Pedersen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-18 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
85.1%
40W–7L · 63.5% of games
4.5
58.5%
24W–17L · 53.2% of games
8.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 59.4% of games
8.5mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 59% of games
9.0mixed
78.3%
18W–5L · 65.3% of games
9.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
37 matches
#1 Singles
13%
20 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert