← Search

Emily Pedersen

Westminster, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
199 matches · 139W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Emily Pedersen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history199 matches
W
2026-08-25 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ginger Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
Kelly Hardy / Susan Duffy
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Chelsea Crowell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-04 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chelsea Crowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-28 · RCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chelsea Crowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-26 · RCC RED · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jonathan Hoke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
Glenn Johnson / Heather Green
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · with Alex Pedersen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Alex Pedersen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-21 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chelsea Crowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · BP GREEN · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Michael Conde mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · RCC RED · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christian O'Rourke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · BP GREEN · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Daniel Lizarribar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Natalia Isabel Camera Perez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
94.1%
16W–1L · 66.6% of games
4.5
72.8%
59W–22L · 59.9% of games
8.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 60.3% of games
8.5mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 57.1% of games
9.0mixed
65.6%
21W–11L · 59.2% of games
9.5mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 54.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
43 matches
#1 Singles
7%
14 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova