← Search

Phillip James

— year-end
196 matches · 66W–130L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Phillip James to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history196 matches
L
2026-08-13 · James/LF/tri4.0M · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Rick Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-08-05 · James/LF/tri4.0M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Enterline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-30 · James/LF/tri4.0M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Enterline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
David Schmidt / Marcus Huck
2026-07-15 · James/LF/tri4.0M · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Todd Spangler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
Joseph Odon / David Wong
2026-07-08 · James/LF/tri4.0M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rick Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-17 · Schmidt/LF 18s 3.0M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Larry Stalcup
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-11 · James/TU/3.5M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · Schmidt/LF 18s 3.0M · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Newport
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · James/TU/3.5M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-01 · Schmidt/LF 18s 3.0M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Newport
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-05-18 · Schmidt/LF 18s 3.0M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Newport
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · James/LF · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Maloney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Teams32 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0
56.8%
21W–16L · 54.4% of games
3.5
22%
22W–78L · 39.1% of games
7.0
41.8%
23W–32L · 46.3% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
53 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova