← Search

Anthony Maddox

Tulsa, OK
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 48W–18L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Anthony Maddox to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
W
2026-08-05 · Norton/LF/tri 4.0 M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Pride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-30 · Norton/LF/tri 4.0 M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Pride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · Norton/LF/tri 4.0 M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bryan Beckman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-12 · OKWC/Lusnak/18&over8.0X · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrea Williford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-06 · 1: Hayes/IS 18s 7.0X · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Bradt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-28 · OKWC/Lusnak/18&over8.0X · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with MONICA MCCAFFERTY mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-26 · 1: Hayes/IS 18s 7.0X · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Bradt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · 1: Hayes/IS 18s 7.0X · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Macie Brubaker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
Stefanie Lee / John Lee
2026-06-22 · 1: Hayes/IS 18s 7.0X · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Bradt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-07 · OKWC/Lusnak/18&over8.0X · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jordan Lusnak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-04 · Maddox/GR 18s 4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taylor Pride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-17 · 1: Hayes/IS 18s 7.0X · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Bradt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 61.9% of games
3.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.9% of games
3.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 60.7% of games
4.0
68.4%
13W–6L · 60.4% of games
7.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 55.1% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
30 matches
#2 Singles
17%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
8 matches
#1 Singles
11%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams