← Search

Dawn Bartz

Newark, DE
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
136 matches · 84W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dawn Bartz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history136 matches
L
2026-07-28 · Get Smashed · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeanna Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-04 · Get Smashed · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeanna Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-03 · Absolut Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeanna Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-23 · DDT 18+ · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Claire Parisi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-14 · DDT 18+ · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine Jamison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Jamison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Farcht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
Diane Carlin / Tammy Reilly
2025-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Jamison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-5, 1-0
L
2025-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Jamison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-5, 1-0
L
2025-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Hathaway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine Jamison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
65.2%
60W–32L · 56% of games
3.5
0%
0W–7L · 30% of games
6.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 58.6% of games
6.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
26 matches
#1 Singles
13%
18 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King