← Search

J Barnes Stephenson

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 32W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add J Barnes Stephenson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
James McCaskill / Matt Wiggs
2026-09-10 · Wes.Dyke40C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bradford Aron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-03 · Wes.Dyke40C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Luis Arcos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-20 · Wes.Dyke40C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bradford Aron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-30 · We.Dyke18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wes Dyke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-28 · We.Dyke18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Grunberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · Da.Breazeale40S · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-08 · Da.Breazeale40S · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · Da.Breazeale40S · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-5
L
2026-06-09 · We.Dyke18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Breazeale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-03 · Da.Breazeale40S · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-20 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-29 · Is.Pataki40A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Stieber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
55.3%
26W–21L · 51.7% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#1 Singles
14%
9 matches
#2 Singles
11%
7 matches
#3 Singles
11%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe