← Search

Russell Riley

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
168 matches · 109W–59L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Russell Riley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history168 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Co.Vinson18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with James Miron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-30 · Co.Vinson18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with James Miron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-23 · Co.Vinson18C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ben Glass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · St.Wingo18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Steven Markham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-30 · Co.Vinson18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabriel Iocco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · Co.Vinson18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Craig Schauman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-26 · Co.Vinson18M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Colleen Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-3
W
2026-07-16 · Co.Vinson18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sam Osman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-14 · Co.Vinson18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donny Joyce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · Jo.Whalen18M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabrielle Shields mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-05 · Co.Vinson18M · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Colleen Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · Co.Vinson18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Whitehurst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
67.7%
67W–32L · 53.8% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
67.9%
19W–9L · 51.9% of games
4.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 57.6% of games
4.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.6% of games
9.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
45 matches
#1 Singles
17%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
25 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova