← Search

Carl Cotter

RICHARDSON, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 27W–15L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Carl Cotter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Team 29 Canyon Creek/Boyer M4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-27 · Canyon Creek/Boyer M4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Clark Red
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Kit Martin / Brad Matheny
2026-03-22 · Indy A55 8.0M IRCD Gupta · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Doug Shafer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-02-24 · Canyon Creek/Cotter M4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Henke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christopher Abel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-01-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stan Bradshaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-07-27 · Canyon Creek/Jost X7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dawn Cotter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-07-13 · Canyon Creek/Jost X7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dawn Cotter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with William Ragle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with MARK HOPPER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-04-27 · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-10 · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 66.3% of games
4.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 58.4% of games
4.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 34.5% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 56.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
17 matches
#1 Singles
24%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
7 matches
#2 Singles
12%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer