← Search

Melodie Marx

— year-end
60 matches · 31W–29L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Melodie Marx to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
L
2026-07-15 · Stern: RTC Ladies · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Hillmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-09 · Moe Bowden Summer 55 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Monique Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-24 · Stern: RTC Ladies · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Hillmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-11 · Moe Bowden Summer 55 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Koch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-03 · Stern: RTC Ladies · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Hillmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-28 · Moe Bowden Summer 55 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendi Stern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-27 · Stern: RTC Ladies · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendi Stern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-20 · Stern: RTC Ladies · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Hillmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-28 · Hillmer: Tonka JEMM’s · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Hillmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-14 · Hillmer: Tonka JEMM’s · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Hillmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-31 · Hillmer: Tonka JEMM’s · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Hillmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-24 · Hillmer: Tonka JEMM’s · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Starita
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Teams43 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
53.3%
24W–21L · 50.2% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 55.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King