← Search

Mary Ellen Stasko

Cinnaminson, NJ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
112 matches · 65W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Ellen Stasko to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history112 matches
L
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with Marie Blaker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-06-16 · NJD/4th Set · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Berigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-13 · SPRING SOUTH/4th Set · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Ahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · SPRING SOUTH/4th Set · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelah Joner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-09 · SPRING SOUTH/4th Set · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Ahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-12 · NJD/4th Set · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marie Blaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-03-06 · Mixed, Not Stirred · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joe Schickling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-13 · Mixed, Not Stirred · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joe Schickling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-01-30 · Mixed, Not Stirred · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joe Schickling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-01-04 · 4th Set · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marie Blaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2025-12-07 · 4th Set · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Kettering
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-19 · 4th Set · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Ahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
93.3%
14W–1L · 75.1% of games
3.5
47.4%
27W–30L · 50% of games
6.5mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 58.4% of games
7.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
28 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe