← Search

Stacey Whisman

— year-end
24 matches · 2W–22L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Stacey Whisman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
L
2025-05-20 · Bent Creek - Pasic · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer Zuidema
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2024-07-10 · Bent Creek's Charming Challengers (Pasic) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Claudia Palandjian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-07-08 · Bent Creek's Charming Challengers (Pasic) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Linda Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2022-07-13 · Bent Creek - Jaskulis · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2022-06-04 · Bent Creek - Jaskulis · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2021-06-30 · Bent Creek - Racquet Scientists · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2021-06-28 · Bent Creek - Racquet Scientists · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carolyn White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2021-06-16 · Bent Creek - Racquet Scientists · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2021-06-15 · Bent Creek - Racquet Scientists · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2021-06-14 · Bent Creek - Racquet Scientists · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2019-12-04 · RCW Lanc - Willoughby · #2 Doubles · with Bridget Willoughby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2019-11-13 · RCW Lanc - Willoughby · #1 Doubles · with Jennie Barbieri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Teams7 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
12.5%
2W–14L · 39.3% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
9 matches
#1 Singles
29%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer