← Search

Andrea Sain

Statesville, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 49W–36L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Andrea Sain to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mitzi Arrowood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-02 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karie Lehigh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maile Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-19 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maile Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-18 · LDST-Stamey-Reimann/SCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lawren Wells
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Sara Griffith championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-13 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-13 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Becky Brittain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-08-11 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mitzi Arrowood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-30 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · TLMCA - Cassidy/Caldwell · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Spillman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-13 · Kim/RB/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Griffith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
72.5%
37W–14L · 59% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 48.9% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
29 matches
#1 Singles
24%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
8 matches
#1 Female Doubles
7%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova