← Search

Vincent Tessier

— year-end
260 matches · 157W–103L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Vincent Tessier to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history260 matches
L
2026-09-09 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Philip Luna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-02 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Rasmussen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-12 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adrian Selby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-05 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adrian Selby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-29 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adrian Selby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-06 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Tang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-30 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-16 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-05-09 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jawaid Motiwala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jaden Tiriolo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-03-28 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tobias Janssens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-02-28 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Clinten Butts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
25%
2W–6L · 42% of games
4.0
82%
73W–16L · 62.3% of games
4.5
46.9%
46W–52L · 48.5% of games
7.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 66.9% of games
7.5mixed
92.3%
12W–1L · 61% of games
8.0mixed
40%
10W–15L · 48.3% of games
8.5mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
45 matches
#1 Singles
10%
25 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams