← Search

Eric Rasmussen

Henderson, NV
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
154 matches · 62W–92L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eric Rasmussen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history154 matches
L
2026-09-02 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vincent Tessier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-15 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Akira Back
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-06 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mike Burgoyne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-26 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christa Casper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-25 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-11 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-01 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ava Nhaisi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
JJ Fuller
2026-03-28 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-03-22 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christa Casper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-21 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Aaron Shumway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-14 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cody Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 39% of games
4.0
81.8%
18W–4L · 62.8% of games
4.5
32.7%
33W–68L · 42.6% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 44.7% of games
8.5mixed
60%
6W–4L · 51% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
40 matches
#1 Singles
18%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
25 matches
#2 Singles
11%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert