← Search

Estera Biscos

Hickory, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 39W–37L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Estera Biscos to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
W
2026-08-29 · Moore-Kiser/HCP/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shoshana Goshen-Harper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-22 · Moore-Kiser/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-20 · Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Dufour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-27 · Abernathy/HCP/Foothills · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-20 · Abernathy/HCP/Foothills · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-15 · Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-13 · Abernathy/HCP/Foothills · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-07 · Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Dufour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-25 · Abernathy/HCP/Foothills · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-09 · Abernathy/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Gettys
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-2
W
2026-03-04 · Wilson/HCP/Foothills · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-10-08 · Moore/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
50%
3W–3L · 49% of games
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
45.7%
16W–19L · 49.4% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 62.6% of games
6.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 53.2% of games
7.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 37.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
25 matches
#1 Singles
28%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
10 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe