← Search

Christopher Simmons

Vestavia Hills, AL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 38W–10L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Christopher Simmons to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
W
2026-09-10 · HCC - Leasure/Monson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Blanton Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-09-09 · HCC - Carden Fall 2026 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Monson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-01 · HCC - Monson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Charles Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · HCC - Monson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Graham Minor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-31 · Lifetime - Benoit · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jeff Stephenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-16 · Lifetime - Benoit · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Richard Crum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
Matthew Davis / Blanton Reed
2026-06-30 · Hoover Met - Turner · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Pyron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · Hoover Met - Turner · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrew Pyron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-21 · Hoover Met - Turner · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Pyron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-12 · HCC - Leasure/Monson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-07 · HCC - Leasure/Monson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-23 · HCC - Leasure/Monson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcus Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
80%
32W–8L · 60.6% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
14 matches
#1 Singles
15%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova