← Search

Charles Black

Vestavia Hills, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 18W–11L · seasons 2026–2027

Captains: add Charles Black to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history29 matches
W
2026-09-09 · HCC - Carden Fall 2026 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-08 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · HCC - Monson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christopher Simmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · HCC - Monson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Blanton Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-25 · HCC - Monson · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Blanton Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Greg Brockwell / David Thompson
2026-08-19 · HCC - Monson · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Blanton Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-04 · HCC - Monson · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matt Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-20 · Hoover Met - Miller · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jack Bransdorf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-13 · Hoover Met - Miller · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Salim Virani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-06 · Hoover Met - Miller · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-22 · Hoover Met - Miller · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chad Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-15 · Hoover Met - Miller · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 59.8% of games
4.0
60%
6W–4L · 51.4% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
9 matches
#1 Singles
21%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer