← Search

Amy Conway

Plymouth, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 49W–23L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Conway to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
L
2026-07-17 · RCAA-Moore 18s 6.0X F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cason Conway mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-07 · NAC-Conway 40s 3.0 NW F4 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Irene Tseng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-23 · NAC-Conway 40s 3.0 NW F4 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · RCAA-Moore 18s 6.0X F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cason Conway mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-18 · HV-Moore 40s 60 Mix F2 · #1 Doubles · with Cason Conway mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-12 · HV-Moore 40s 60 Mix F2 · #1 Doubles · with Cason Conway mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
Ben Berry / Elisabeth Berry
2026-02-28 · HV-Moore 40s 60 Mix F2 · #2 Doubles · with Cason Conway mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-07 · HV-Moore 40s 60 Mix F2 · #2 Doubles · with Cason Conway mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
L
2025-12-13 · 1SCWB-Chen 65 WOMEN COMBO F3 · #3 Doubles · with Jeannette Poploskie
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2025-11-08 · 1SCWB-Chen 65 WOMEN COMBO F3 · #3 Doubles · with Jane Hale
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-07-15 · 1NAC-CONWAY 30NW TU 40&O SEM F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Crosby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-07-08 · 1NAC-CONWAY 30NW TU 40&O SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Vellucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
74.2%
23W–8L · 60.9% of games
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 59.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert