← Search

Jaclyn Pulice

Rochester Hills, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 69W–28L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jaclyn Pulice to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Jamie Lichtle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
Julie Gardzinski / Pam Kloet
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Jamie Lichtle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
Julie Ewy / Elizabeth King
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with Jamie Lichtle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Jacqueline Coffman / Kelly Moran
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Jamie Lichtle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-5
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Jamie Lichtle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · LT-Pietrangelo 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Logan Beard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-17 · LT-Pietrangelo 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Logan Beard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-07-15 · WESS-Li 18s 3.5 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Lichtle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-14 · LT-Szymanski 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Lichtle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · WESS-Li 18s 3.5 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Lichtle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-01 · WESS-Li 18s 3.5 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · LT-Donovan 40s 3.5 DW F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Lichtle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
75%
18W–6L · 62.8% of games
3.5
77.3%
17W–5L · 62.7% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.8% of games
6.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 53% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 59.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
24 matches
#1 Singles
12%
12 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova