← Search

Jacob Kargauer

Melbourne, FL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 94W–40L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jacob Kargauer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
W
2026-08-27 · EFSC - Flores · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Thomas Eskridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · Fee - Lackey · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angel Alayon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-01 · Fee - Lackey · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bruno Pintchovski Rodrigues
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-24 · Brevard/Reich · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amber Saxon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-07-23 · Brevard/Flores · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Abby Runda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-21 · Brevard/Flores · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andrea Swanson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-18 · Fee - Lackey · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bruno Pintchovski Rodrigues
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-5
W
2026-07-07 · Brevard/Reich · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amber Saxon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · Brevard/Reich · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emily Criste mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · Brevard/Reich · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amber Saxon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · Fee - Lackey · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bruno Pintchovski Rodrigues
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · Brevard/Flores · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gabrielle Hebert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
10.5
100%
6W–0L · 63% of games
4.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 57.8% of games
4.5
70%
14W–6L · 56.9% of games
7.5
100%
6W–0L · 63.2% of games
8.5
75%
12W–4L · 54.7% of games
9.5
70%
7W–3L · 57.3% of games
10.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
75%
21W–7L · 59.1% of games
9.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 55% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
26 matches
#1 Male Doubles
10%
14 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe