← Search

Thomas Eskridge

— year-end
46 matches · 19W–27L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Thomas Eskridge to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
W
2026-08-27 · EFSC - Flores · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jacob Kargauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-12 · EFSC The Wild Westmorelands · #1 Male Doubles · 10.5 · with Nathan Hartnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Casey Coffey / Leonardo DaSilva
2026-01-08 · EFSC The Wild Westmorelands · #1 Male Doubles · 10.5 · with Stephen Westmoreland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-13 · EFSC - Zavaleta · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andy McConnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2025-11-06 · EFSC - Zavaleta · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andy McConnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-16 · EFSC - Zavaleta · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Norman Hosan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-25 · EFSC - Zavaleta · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Norman Hosan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-11 · EFSC - Zavaleta · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Norman Hosan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
Richard Boysen / Michael Carpenter
2025-08-27 · EFSC - Zavaleta · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nico San Nicolas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-02-28 · EFSC - Hartnett · #1 Male Doubles · 9.5 · with Stephen Westmoreland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-02-07 · EFSC - Hartnett · #1 Male Doubles · 9.5 · with Stephen Westmoreland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-31 · EFSC - Hartnett · #1 Male Doubles · 9.5 · with Garrett Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
10.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
80%
4W–1L · 63% of games
4.5
0%
0W–5L · 31.9% of games
8.5
50%
10W–10L · 48.6% of games
9.5
20%
1W–4L · 36% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
9 matches
#1 Male Doubles
13%
6 matches
#2 Male Doubles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert