Scott Eifert
59 matches · 27W–32L · seasons 2019–2025
Captains: add Scott Eifert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history59 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
Teams16 teams · 2020–2025
Blue Point, Freeman/Subject
Blue Point, Romano
Blue Point, Siegmund
Blue Point, Romano
Blue Point, Romano/Tang
Blue Point, Siegmund
Deer Park, Patel/Bunting
LI: Deer Park, Bratos
Blue Point, Siegmund
Deer Park, Ng
Deer Park, Patel/Bunting
Deer Park, Patel & Bunting
LI: Deer Park, Ng
Deer Park, Lefebvre/Lowery
Deer Park, Lefebvre/Lowery
Deer Park, Lefebvre/Ng
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 52.8% of games
3.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 43.5% of games
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.5% of games
7.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 54.2% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
25 matches
#4 Doubles
19%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
9 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Pressure is a privilege.