← Search

Bradford Powell

Concord, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 34W–67L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Bradford Powell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
L
2026-09-05 · LJLA-Lands/NMP · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rip Robbins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-4
W
2026-08-15 · LJLA-Lands/NMP · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rip Robbins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-03 · TLMCR-Crutch/CSD/Tri-B 40+ · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · TLJLA-Lands/BRP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey McCue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-20 · TLMCR-Crutch/CSD/Tri-B 40+ · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · TLJLA-Lands/BRP · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adam Lidgey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-13 · TLMCR-Crutch/CSD/Tri-B 40+ · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chuck Geer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-02 · TLJLA-Lands/BRP · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adam Lidgey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · TLJLA-Lands/BRP · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Mexcur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-22 · TLMCR-Crutch/CSD/Tri-B 40+ · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chuck Geer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-01 · TLMCR-Crutch/CSD/Tri-B 40+ · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chuck Geer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-09 · LJLA-Lands/NMP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caleb OBriant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
44%
11W–14L · 47.4% of games
3.5
16.7%
5W–25L · 38.5% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
45.8%
11W–13L · 46.7% of games
7.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 39.7% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 31.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova