← Search

David Fuerst

Cornelius, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 56W–78L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add David Fuerst to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Yadkin/Clay/18+6.5 Combo · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brian Acker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-03 · Yadkin/Clay/18+6.5 Combo · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeff Clay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · TLSPO-Porter - Jetton · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dan Reinhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-20 · TLSPO-Porter - Jetton · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Hogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · TLSPO-Porter - Jetton · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Reiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-06-01 · TLSPO-Porter - Jetton · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Hogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-05-03 · LKMa-MacVean/CSD · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-05 · LKMa-MacVean/CSD · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-26 · LTVA-Vallejos/mccue/Bailey · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Hogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-21 · LKMa-MacVean/CSD · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-14 · LTVA-Vallejos-Mccue/Bailey Rd · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Clay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-22 · RJ-LOOMIS/NMP · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Dixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
38.2%
21W–34L · 47.1% of games
3.5
21.1%
4W–15L · 37.7% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
14W–14L · 51.9% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
25 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe