← Search

Samantha Quaderer

Troy, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 42W–41L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Samantha Quaderer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
L
Stephanie Burke / Tanya Kotlyar
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · with Diane Leathers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
Angie Garcia
2026-08-01 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-22 · WESS-Studier 18s 3.0 NW F3 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · WESS-Studier 18s 3.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lorena Cruz Santiago
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
Susan Lepri / Jazmin Castillo
2026-07-05 · WESS-Studier 18s 3.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leeann Vincent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-06-25 · WESS-Studier 18s 3.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Dickstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-23 · WESS-Studier 40s 3.0 NW F1 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · WESS-Studier 18s 3.0 NW F3 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-09 · WESS-Studier 40s 3.0 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Venos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-06-04 · WESS-Studier 18s 3.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Burgam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-14 · WESS-Studier 18s 3.0 NW F3 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-02-28 · WESS-Smiley-Studier 30 WOMEN winter SINGLES F · #1 Singles · 6.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
55%
22W–18L · 53.4% of games
5.5
40%
4W–6L · 51.4% of games
6.0
50%
5W–5L · 54.2% of games
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 38.9% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 58.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 29% of the time
#1 Singles
29%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
14 matches
#2 Singles
13%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova