← Search

Dina Hurnevich

Bloomfield Hills, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
168 matches · 100W–68L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Dina Hurnevich to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history168 matches
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Lina E Bata championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-11 · WESS-Reamer 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-07 · WESS-Reamer 40s 3.0 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shauntelle Angle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · DEER-Gibbs 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-29 · DEER-Gibbs 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-25 · WESS-Reamer 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lina E Bata
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · WESS-Reamer 40s 3.0 NW F1 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · DEER-Gibbs 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
Zoe De Wit / Jaime Dobronos
2026-06-11 · WESS-Reamer 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vicki Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-01 · DEER-Gibbs 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with AnnMarie Sanford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-05-26 · WESS-Reamer 40s 3.0 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Fernandez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-19 · WESS-Reamer 40s 3.0 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vicki Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
50%
10W–10L · 53.8% of games
3.0
61.8%
34W–21L · 53.3% of games
3.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 39.4% of games
5.0
80%
4W–1L · 63.6% of games
5.5
83.3%
15W–3L · 71.8% of games
6.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 51.6% of games
6.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 62.8% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 66.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
43 matches
#1 Singles
20%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
28 matches
#2 Singles
10%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal