← Search

Brian Darr

Covington, LA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 45W–34L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Brian Darr to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history79 matches
W
2026-08-29 · Barach-40/6.5/M-StoneCreek · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brandon Beyl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-19 · Barach-40/6.5/M-StoneCreek · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brandon Beyl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-10 · Parvizian/18s/3.5/SC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Darr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-30 · McGuire/40s/3.5/SC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Darr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-22 · McGuire/40s/3.5/SC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Biggs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-12 · Parvizian/18s/3.5/SC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Darr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · Parvizian/40s/3.0/SC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Magness mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-26 · Parvizian/40s/3.0/SC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Magness mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-05-18 · Parvizian/40s/3.0/SC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Magness mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-07 · Parvizian-18/3.5/M/StoneCreek · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neal Daigle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-06 · Parvizian-18/3.5/M/StoneCreek · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-22 · Parvizian-18/3.5/M/StoneCreek · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
68.4%
13W–6L · 63.9% of games
3.5
17.6%
3W–14L · 34% of games
6.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 55.9% of games
3.0mixed
77.8%
14W–4L · 57% of games
3.5mixed
50%
6W–6L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
19 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King