← Search

Neal Daigle

— year-end
54 matches · 26W–28L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Neal Daigle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
L
2026-05-07 · Parvizian-18/3.5/M/StoneCreek · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Darr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-06 · Parvizian-18/3.5/M/StoneCreek · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Richard Jr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-28 · Parvizian-18/3.5/M/StoneCreek · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Kramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-25 · Parvizian/Arthur-40/3.5/M/StoneCreek · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Farrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-16 · Arthur-55/3.5/M/StoneCreek · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Farrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-02-14 · Arthur-55/3.5/M/StoneCreek · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Farrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-07 · Parvizian/Arthur-40/3.5/M/StoneCreek · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandon Migliore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-01-17 · Arthur-55/3.5/M/StoneCreek · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Farrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-01-15 · Arthur-55/3.5/M/StoneCreek · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Short
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-09-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryan Quarls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-09-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryan Quarls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-09-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryan Quarls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
54.8%
17W–14L · 51.7% of games
6.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 50.4% of games
3.5mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova