← Search

Tracie Chambers

Pennsville, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
208 matches · 119W–89L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tracie Chambers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history208 matches
L
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Ivy Brown championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-30 · Vamos! · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelly Jobes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · SOUTH/Grandest Slammers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Meridith Bebee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-16 · 4th Set · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deb Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-6
L
2026-07-13 · Vamos! · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelly Jobes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-09 · 4th Set · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deb Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-06-18 · Notorious 40 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Jill O'Neill / Lee Sullivan
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · with Edward Bouscaren championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-22 · Vamos! · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelly Jobes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-0, 0-1
L
2026-05-20 · SOUTH/Grandest Slammers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelly Jobes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · Double Fierce · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Casella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-17 · Grand Slammers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Jobes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.3% of games
3.5
63.8%
30W–17L · 58.8% of games
4.0
57.8%
26W–19L · 52.8% of games
7.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 53.5% of games
8.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 59.5% of games
7.0mixed
37.9%
11W–18L · 48.9% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
73 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
59 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova