← Search

Jingkang Wang

Royal Oak, MI
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 85W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jingkang Wang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history123 matches
W
2026-07-01 · BHC-Uhlar 18s 4.5M F3 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Xiaoqiang Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-24 · BHC-Uhlar 18s 4.5M F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Harry Greenspan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-20 · BHC-Uhlar 18s 4.5M F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Birchmeier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-03-07 · BT-Rosen MEN MED TRI F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brian Wayne
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-01 · BT-Rosen MEN MED TRI F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brendan Childress
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
Jason Chen / Joshua Lattie
2026-02-21 · BT-Rosen MEN MED TRI F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brian Wayne
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-02-14 · BT-Rosen MEN MED TRI F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Xiaoqiang Li
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-07-23 · 4BEV-UHLAR 45M WE 18&O SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tom Aubrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-07-09 · 4BEV-UHLAR 45M WE 18&O SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Aaron Rosen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-06-25 · 4BEV-UHLAR 45M WE 18&O SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Charlie Grace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-06-04 · 4BEV-UHLAR 45M WE 18&O SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Miles Uhlar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-04-27 · #1 Doubles · with Brendan Childress championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
81%
34W–8L · 59.8% of games
4.5
61.1%
22W–14L · 51% of games
5.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
24 matches
#1 Singles
12%
15 matches
#2 Singles
7%
8 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert