← Search

Xiaoqiang Li

— year-end
181 matches · 113W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Xiaoqiang Li to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history181 matches
L
2026-07-08 · BHC-Uhlar 18s 4.5M F3 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brian Wayne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · BHC-Uhlar 18s 4.5M F3 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jingkang Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Daniel Carlson / David Yang
2026-06-30 · BHC-Uhlar 40s 4.5M · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Miles Uhlar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-15 · BHC-Uhlar 40s 4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Miles Uhlar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · BT- Manepalli 18s 5.0M · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Haresh Anand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-08 · BHC-Uhlar 40s 4.5M · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Miles Uhlar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-28 · BT- Manepalli 18s 5.0M · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Chris Wise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
Masataka Arimura / Ryo Murakami
2026-05-27 · BHC-Uhlar 18s 4.5M F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Miles Uhlar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-17 · FAC-Keranen 40&O 90 Mix · #1 Doubles · with Heather Tallinger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-21 · BT-Rosen MEN MED TRI F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brian Wayne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-03-07 · BT-Rosen MEN MED TRI F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brian Wayne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
Naoko McKelvey / James Lang
2026-03-01 · FAC-Keranen 40&O 90 Mix · #3 Doubles · with Trish Keranen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
10.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 51.4% of games
4.5
64.3%
63W–35L · 55.9% of games
5.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 45.2% of games
9.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 52% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
62 matches
#1 Singles
26%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
17 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer