← Search

Roman Giger

Ann Arbor, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 26W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Roman Giger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
L
Michael Larson / Patrick Serda
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with Marvin Sauer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-06 · HV-Bahrou 40s 3.5M F3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ned Staebler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · HV-Bahrou 40s 3.5M F3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremy Carroll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-27 · HV-Chun 18s 3.5M F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dominick Zaccone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · HV-Chun 18s 3.5M F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rajesh Jayaraman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-11-14 · 4HV-Diba 35 MEN SINGLES F2 · #2 Singles · 7.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6
W
2025-10-18 · 4HV-Diba 35 MEN SINGLES F2 · #2 Singles · 7.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-23 · 2HV-CHUN 35M WE 18&O SEM F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bala Kondur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-07-09 · 2HV-CHUN 35M WE 18&O SEM F3 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-30 · 3HV-BAHROU 35M MO 40&O SEM F3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with James McKenzie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-06-28 · 3HV-BAHROU 35M MO 40&O SEM F3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dominick Zaccone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-25 · 2HV-CHUN 35M WE 18&O SEM F3 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
50%
21W–21L · 48% of games
6.5
0%
0W–9L · 29.1% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 45.7% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Singles, 26% of the time
#2 Singles
26%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
4 matches
#3 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams