← Search

Michael Chaize

Ann Arbor, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 42W–19L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Michael Chaize to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
W
2026-07-22 · LIB-Kornfeld 18s 3.5M F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brad Stieber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Gensheimer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-13 · CHIP-Bowman 40s 3.5M F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Sitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
Joseph Rundle / James Jarvis
2026-07-08 · LIB-Kornfeld 18s 3.5M F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shepard Peir Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · CHIP-Bowman 40s 3.5M F3 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
Jeffrey David / Ben Moerman
2026-06-24 · LIB-Kornfeld 18s 3.5M F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shepard Peir Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-22 · CHIP-Bowman 40s 3.5M F3 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Qi Gao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-10 · LIB-Kornfeld 18s 3.5M F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brad Stieber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-08 · CHIP-Bowman 40s 3.5M F3 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-05 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chelsea Doyle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-01 · CHIP-Bowman 40s 3.5M F3 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
69.7%
23W–10L · 59.2% of games
4.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
60%
6W–4L · 56% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.3% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
10 matches
#2 Singles
12%
7 matches
#1 Singles
8%
5 matches
#3 Singles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert