← Search

Tanya Durbin

— year-end
164 matches · 99W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tanya Durbin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history164 matches
L
2026-07-12 · A18 3.5W PCC Innes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · A18 3.5W PCC Innes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-06 · A18 3.5W PCC Innes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-16 · A40 3.5W PCC Innes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-11 · A18 3.5W PCC Innes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · A55 7.0W D TP Fox · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Lutz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-04 · A18 3.5W PCC Innes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-06-01 · A18 3.5W PCC Innes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-28 · A18 3.5W PCC Innes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-21 · A18 3.5W PCC Innes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brittany Root
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-12 · A40 3.5W PCC Innes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda McMillen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-07-21 · A18 3.5W PCC Innes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda McMillen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 58.4% of games
3.0
60.3%
35W–23L · 53.9% of games
3.5
54.3%
25W–21L · 51.4% of games
5.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 54.9% of games
6.5
66.7%
14W–7L · 54.6% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 57.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
23 matches
#1 Singles
13%
22 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal