← Search

Ronni Jarvis

Lagrangeville, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
214 matches · 128W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ronni Jarvis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history214 matches
W
James Bittker / Jane Fisher
2026-08-16 · Mixed Magic · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Melville mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · Mixed Magic · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christopher Kroner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-05 · Taconic Smash · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Leary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-29 · Taconic Smash · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Leary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-07-27 · Taconic Smash · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Leary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-20 · TSR: Synergy · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-17 · Mixed Magic · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Melville mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · Taconic Wise Aces · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Curcio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-08 · MH:TSR Insta-Slam · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Lois
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · Taconic Wise Aces · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 59.6% of games
3.5
75.4%
49W–16L · 60.6% of games
4.0
38.7%
12W–19L · 46.4% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.9% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 56.9% of games
7.0mixed
56.6%
30W–23L · 53.9% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
58 matches
#1 Singles
10%
21 matches
#2 Singles
5%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova