← Search

Danielle Franzella

Lagrangeville, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 34W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Danielle Franzella to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
L
2026-07-09 · MH: TSR: Get A Grip · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Corrado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-06-18 · MH: TSR: Get A Grip · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-16 · Matchpoint · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Herlihy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-11 · Taconic-McLeod/Jarvis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne McLeod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-22 · Taconic-McLeod/Jarvis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Corrado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-08 · Taconic-McLeod/Jarvis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-31 · Solo 8.0XD 18+ · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Lake mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-10 · Solo 7.0XD · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nathan Kerxhalli mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-14 · Solo 7.0XD · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ravi Pandya mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-12-06 · Solo 7.0XD · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nathan Kerxhalli mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-17 · MKCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
N/A
2025-09-19 · MKCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Schulman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
49.2%
31W–32L · 51% of games
7.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 33.3% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
14 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert