← Search

Lee Leerdam

— year-end
36 matches · 21W–15L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Lee Leerdam to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Sanlando-Cusick · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alejandra Maddox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-12 · Sanlando-Cusick · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alison Mosley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-04 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kelly Wiseman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-01 · Sanlando-Cusick · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brittany de Arcos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-14 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kelly Wiseman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kelly Wiseman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-01 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brittany de Arcos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-05-29 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brittany de Arcos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-11 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Esther Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-27 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brittany de Arcos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-20 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brittany de Arcos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-13 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brittany de Arcos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Teams15 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 52.3% of games
4.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.1% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams