← Search

David Kopacz

SHELBY TOWNSHIP, MI
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 7W–9L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add David Kopacz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
W
2023-07-23 · 1TROY-SINGH AD18&O 35M MO SEM F1 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-07-10 · 1TROY-SINGH AD18&O 35M MO SEM F1 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2023-06-05 · 1TROY-SINGH AD18&O 35M MO SEM F1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2023-05-22 · 1TROY-SINGH AD18&O 35M MO SEM F1 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2023-05-08 · 1TROY-SINGH AD18&O 35M MO SEM F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brett Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2021-07-27 · 3FAC-ROSS 40M 18&O AD TUES SEM F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Wysocki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2021-07-20 · 3FAC-ROSS 40M 18&O AD TUES SEM F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Filus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2021-07-13 · 3FAC-ROSS 40M 18&O AD TUES SEM F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Wysocki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2021-06-22 · 3FAC-ROSS 40M 18&O AD TUES SEM F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2021-02-12 · #1 Doubles · with Jordan Paterra
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2020-11-14 · #2 Doubles · with Robert Cupples
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2020-11-06 · #3 Doubles · with Cade McLogan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2021–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
50%
4W–4L · 53% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 44.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
3 matches
#2 Singles
19%
3 matches
#1 Singles
13%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova