← Search

Catherine Boone

— year-end
56 matches · 27W–29L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Catherine Boone to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
2024-06-28 · Pattabiraman, Karthick · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yijia Liu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-06-21 · Pattabiraman, Karthick · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with RAGHURAMAN RAMASUBBU mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-06-07 · Pattabiraman, Karthick · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Miguel Bahena-Garcia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2022-02-11 · Groves, Mary · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Goodlow-Vinduska
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2022-01-23 · Groves, Mary · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Stahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
Susan McConkey / Amanda Miller
2022-01-16 · Groves, Mary · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Castaner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2021-12-19 · Crawford, Janet · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-5
W
2021-12-05 · Groves, Mary · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Groves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
Debbie Miller / Tamela Yoder
2021-11-21 · Crawford, Janet · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2021-11-14 · Groves, Mary · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Castaner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2021-11-07 · Crawford, Janet · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tiffany Wilkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2021-10-31 · Groves, Mary · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Stahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
Teams11 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
52.5%
21W–19L · 52.3% of games
3.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 46.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
14 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova