← Search

Amy Fritsch

Exton, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
226 matches · 135W–91L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Fritsch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history226 matches
L
2026-08-08 · #4 Doubles · with Stephanie Brown championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Lisa Matherson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Jeanne Gulasarian championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · Valley Creek · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Matherson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · with Christine Philbin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-0
W
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · with Christine Philbin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
Caitlin Murphy / Jacqueline Luthman
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · with Karen Wertz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-21 · Valley Creek · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Matherson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-20 · Rustin · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-20 · Deuces Wild · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Matherson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · Rustin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Philbin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-14 · Hempfield - Hufnagel · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
76.9%
20W–6L · 63.1% of games
3.5
62.4%
83W–50L · 56.9% of games
4.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 45% of games
7.0
60%
6W–4L · 48.4% of games
7.0mixed
45%
9W–11L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 25% of the time
#1 Doubles
25%
57 matches
#1 Singles
24%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
37 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
15 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova