← Search

Clarissa Manzi

Denver, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 66W–23L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Clarissa Manzi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
W
2026-09-03 · LTC-M YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-02 · LTC-M YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-23 · LTC-M BLUE · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jean Francois mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-09 · LTC-M BLUE · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jean Francois mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-06 · LTC-M YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · LTC-M BLUE · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gregory Richardson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-02 · LTC-M NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-28 · LTC-M GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Port mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-25 · LTC-M NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-11 · LTC-M NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Salzberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-04 · LTC-M NAVY · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-31 · LTC-M GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gregory Richardson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 69.2% of games
3.0
79.7%
47W–12L · 63.5% of games
3.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 43% of games
6.5mixed
75%
6W–2L · 61.8% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
9 matches
#1 Singles
8%
7 matches
#2 Female Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe