← Search

Andrea Salzberg

Denver, CO
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
14 matches · 4W–10L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Andrea Salzberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
W
2026-08-27 · LTC-M YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Read
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-28 · MC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Catalano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-23 · LTC-M YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angelique Manley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-21 · MC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Demers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-09 · LTC-M NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angelique Manley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · MC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Pomerantz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-30 · MC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Demers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-2, 0-0
W
2026-06-18 · LTC-M NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · LTC-M NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clarissa Manzi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-04 · LTC-M NAVY · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Schaeff-accetta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-21 · LTC-M BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clarissa Manzi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-14 · LTC-M BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 41.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams